Skip to main content

About your Search

20120925
20121003
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
it on the table, i gulped. as part of an overall deal, i could accept it. when mccain was except -- suggesting this years ago, i criticized it. it is part of an overall package, which i can accept. >> the next one, though. >> you are right. the next one is probably the hardest of the mall. >> "the tax deduction for mortgage donors." -- owners." >> if i were in charge, i might not want to do that. as part of an overall package, i think you have to. i live in a very high cost place, very high tax, housing interestre enormous, pe bills on mortgages are huge. a lot of money for a lot of friends of mine. this is not abstract. nobly, i would say i do not want this. but again, it is part of a package. >> said is critical. th -- that is critical. it is not immediately clear to a given person whether his tax would go up or down under this. in any case, it just, as a matter of logic, it makes no sense. >> how long have you spell that way? -- felt that way? >> for many years. you realize there is no logical reason for that to be a tax deduction. in other countries, such as canada, they do not have a tax
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)